The Impact of the SARS-COVID-19 Lockdowns on the Subjectively Perceived Performance Level of Amateur Athletes after Returning to the Gyms.

Since December 2019, few issues have garnered as much global attention as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-19). The imposed lockdowns in 2020/21, which led to the closure of all gyms, barred people from participating in their favourite sports activities. This study explores athletes' self-evaluations of their performance levels upon return to training facilities post-reopening. Data were collected in May 2021, after the end of the second lockdown, using a national online questionnaire. The study recorded 20 demographic and training-specific parameters to discern the factors influencing self-perceived performance upon resuming gym activities after the 2020/2021 lockdown. A total of 1378 respondents participated in the study. Of the total number of participants, 27.5% (365) reported regaining 100% of their original performance level after reopening their studios, a proportion that comprised 212 males, 150 females, and 3 individuals of unspecified gender. Additionally, 35.7% (474) estimated their performance level to be up to 75%, followed by 30% (398) recording their performance level at 50%, and a minority of 6.8% (90) determining their performance level to be up to 25%. Exercise intensity prior to lockdown, training experience, sex, and concurrent practice of another sport significantly influenced the athletes' self-assessment of their current fitness levels (p > 0.001, p > 0.001, p > 0.001, and 0.006, respectively). We need to understand the factors that shape self-perception, especially in case of another lockdown, in order to provide preventive assistance concerning mental and physical well-being. Positive influences on self-perception include prior athletic experience, intensive training before the lockdown, and continued participation in sports throughout the lockdown. Younger age is also favourable, but this may not necessarily reflect the benefits of youth; rather, it could indicate the current lack of accessible online sports activities for older individuals. Women, however, might have a less favourable perception of their own athletic performance.

Water exchange technique improves colonoscopy in patients with spinal cord injury: Results of a matched cohort study.

Background and study aims Colonoscopies in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently remain incomplete. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and impact of water exchange colonoscopy (WE) in patients with SCI. Patients and methods Three matched groups, each of 31 patients (WE in SCI patients [WE-SCI]) and in the general population (WE-GP), carbon dioxide-based colonoscopy in SCI patients (CO 2 -SCI)) were analyzed retrospectively. Results Intubation of the cecum and the terminal ileum was achieved in every case in both WE groups. The intubations among the CO 2 -SCI patients succeeded in 29 cases (93.5 %, ns) and 20 cases (64.5 %, P <0.001), respectively. The cecal insertion time (23:17 ± 10:17 min vs. 22:12 ± 16:48 min) and bowel preparation during cecal insertion did not differ between WE-SCI groups. Insertion in the general population was faster (13:38 ± 07:00 min, P <.001) and cleanliness was better. Both WE-SCI groups showed significantly better cleansing results during drawback; the improvement in cleanliness was highest in the WE-SCI (based on the five-step scale 1.4 ± 0.8 vs. 0.8 ± 0.8, P = 0.001). Conclusions The WE in SCI patients is feasible and safe and has the potential to improve the quality of colonoscopies substantially.

Behavioral pain scale may not be reliable in awake non-verbal intensive care patients: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of pain in patients, unable of oral communication, often relies on behavioral assessment. However, some critically ill patients, while non-verbal, are awake and have some potential for self-reporting. The objective was to compare the results of a behavioral pain assessment with self-reporting in awake, non-verbal, critically ill patients unable to use low-tech augmentative and alternative communication tools. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of intubated or tracheotomized adult, ventilated patients with a RASS (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) of -1 to + 1 and inadequate non-verbal communication skills in a surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care university hospital. For pain assessment, the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) was used. Self-reporting of pain was achieved by using an eye tracking device to evaluate the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the pain/discomfort item of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L (EQ-Pain). All measurements were taken at rest. RESULTS: Data was collected from 75 patients. Neither the NRS nor the EQ-Pain (r < .15) correlated with the BPS. However, NRS and EQ-Pain were significantly correlated (r = .78, p = < 0.001), indicating the reliability of the self-reporting by these patients. Neither the duration of intubation/tracheostomy, nor cause for ICU treatment, nor BPS subcategories had an influence on these results. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral pain assessment tools in non-verbal patients who are awake and not in delirium appear unreliable in estimating pain during rest. Before a behavioral assessment tool such as the BPS is used, the application of high-tech AACs should be strongly considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, Registration number: DRKS00021233. Registered 23 April 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00021233 .

Posterior pelvic ring injuries, lumbosacral junction instabilities and stabilization techniques for spinopelvic dissociation: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: From transiliac Harrington rods to minimally invasive (MIS) percutaneous 3D-navigated transsacral-transiliac screw (TTS) fixation, concepts of fixation methods in pelvic injuries with spinopelvic dissociation (SPD) are steadily redefined. This narrative review examines the literature of recent years regarding surgical treatment options and trends in SPD, outlining risks and benefits of each treatment option and addressing biomechanical aspects of sacral injuries and common classification systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search on the search across relevant online databases was conducted. As a scale for quality assessment, the SANRA-scoring system was taken into account. RESULTS: Sacral Isler type 1 injuries of the LPJ in U- and H-type fractures are frequently treated with stand-alone TTS. Fractures with higher instability (Isler types 2 and 3) require unilateral or bilateral LPF, subject to side involvement, as a buttressing construct, or triangular fixation as additional compression and neutralization, determined by fracture radiation. A more comprehensive classification from which to derive stabilization options is provided by the 2023 301SPD classification. MIS techniques are on the rise and offer shorter OR time, less blood loss, fewer infections, and fewer wound complications. It is advisable to implement MIS techniques as much as possible, as long as decompression is not required and closed fracture reduction succeeds satisfactorily. CONCLUSION: SPD is characteristic of severe injuries, mostly in polytraumatized patients. The complication rates are decreasing due to the increasing adaptation of MIS techniques.

[Frequency of Chronic Pain after Work-Related Trauma: A Preliminary Status Survey during Workers' Compensation Rehabilitation in a Tertiary Clinic]. / Häufigkeit chronischer Schmerzen nach Arbeitsunfall ­ Eine erste Statuserhebung im BG-lichen Heilverfahren einer Tertiärklinik.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain after trauma and surgery is a long-term complication. Its relevance for patients within the workers' compensation rehabilitation process has not been adequately investigated. OBJECTIVES: Initial evaluation of frequency of chronic pain after occupational accidents. METHODS: In 2017, surgical inpatients (18-65 y) treated in a tertiary hospital were asked about chronic pain arising from an occupational trauma recognized by statutory occupation insurance (interval 2.8±6.9 years), regardless of care received, first at the time of hospitalization and then by telephone interview 6 months later. The focus was on patients with a work-related trauma (A) within the past month or (B) >6 months. PRIMARY OUTCOME: frequency of work trauma-related chronic pain (>6 months) at the initial interview (point prevalence), secondary outcomes: frequency of chronicity at 6 months (A) and persistence of chronic pain (B). Tertiary outcomes: ability to work, occupational injury classification, burden based on pain intensity, localization, and medication, functional deficits due to the existence of chronic pain, and comorbidity. RESULTS: Out of 415 patients included in the survey, 85% (160/188) reported accident-related chronic pain (predominantly moderate to highly severe in intensity, localized at joints and bones). 90% (131/145) also reported this pain six months later. 67% (64/96) reported chronic pain for the first time. Patients with chronic pain at follow-up (281/369) were less likely to return to work (p=0.003), required analgesics in 60%, were more often comorbid (p<0.002) and had greater functional deficits (p<0.002). CONCLUSION: Despite the preliminary nature of the data, chronic pain seems to be common after occupational trauma and negatively affects the recovery of work ability in the long term. Based on the present observational data, a further differentiated re-evaluation of prospective data considering therapeutic measures is strongly recommended.

Pharmacological elevation of sphingosine-1-phosphate by S1P lyase inhibition accelerates bone regeneration after post-traumatic osteomyelitis.

Posttraumatic osteomyelitis and the ensuing bone defects are a debilitating complication after open fractures with little therapeutic options. We have recently identified potent osteoanabolic effects of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signalling and have now tested whether it may beneficially affect bone regeneration after infection. We employed pharmacological S1P lyase inhibition by 4-deoxypyrodoxin (DOP) to raise S1P levels in vivo in an unicortical long bone defect model of posttraumatic osteomyelitis in mice. In a translational approach, human bone specimens of clinical osteomyelitis patients were treated in organ culture in vitro with DOP. Bone regeneration was assessed by µCT, histomorphometry, immunohistology and gene expression analysis. The role of S1P receptors was addressed using S1PR3 deficient mice. Here, we present data that DOP treatment markedly enhanced osteogenesis in posttraumatic osteomyelitis. This was accompanied by greatly improved osteoblastogenesis and enhanced angiogenesis in the callus accompanied by osteoclast-mediated bone remodelling. We also identified the target of increased S1P to be the S1PR3 as S1PR3-/- mice showed no improvement of bone regeneration by DOP. In the human bone explants, bone mass significantly increased along with enhanced osteoblastogenesis and angiogenesis. Our data suggest that enhancement of S1P/S1PR3 signalling may be a promising therapeutic target for bone regeneration in posttraumatic osteomyelitis.

A salvage procedure: Radial head excision in children and adolescents-short-to-midterm outcomes and overview of the literature.

Purpose: Purpose of the study was to report the outcomes after radial head excision in children and adolescents in addition with a review of the current literature. Methods: We report a series of five children and adolescents, who had undergone a post-traumatic radial head excision. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of elbow/wrist range of motion, stability, deformity and discomforts or restrictions at two follow-up points. Radiographic changes were evaluated. Results: Patient's age at time of the radial head excision averaged 14.6 (13-16) years. Mean time from the injury to the radial head excision was 3.6 (0-9) years. Follow-up I averaged 4.4 (1-8) years and follow-up II 8.5 (7-10) years. At follow-up I, patients showed an average elbow range of motion of 0-10-120° Ext/Flex and 90-0-80° Pro/Sup. Two patients reported discomfort or pain at the elbow. Four (80%) patients had a symptomatic wrist with pain or crepitation at the distal radio ulnar joint. In three (60%) of them, an ulna plus at the wrist was present. Two patients required ulna shortening and autograft stabilization of the interosseous membrane. At final follow-up, all patients reported full functioning with daily activities. Restrictions were present with sport activities. Conclusion: Functional results at the elbow joint might be improved and pain syndromes lessen due to the radial head excision. Problems at the wrist are likely secondary to the procedure. A critical analysis of other options should be performed ahead of the procedure and a careless application should be avoided by all means. Level of evidence: IV.

Minor microbial alterations after faecal diversion do not affect the healing process of anus-near pressure injuries in patients with spinal cord injury - results of a matched case-control study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective matched case-control study including patients with spinal cord injury who presented with an anus-near pressure injury. Two groups were formed based on the presence of a diverting stoma. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the primary microbial colonisation and secondary infection of anus-near pressure injuries depending on the presence of a pre-existing diverting stoma and to investigate the effect on the wound healing. SETTING: University hospital with a spinal cord injury unit. METHODS: A total of 120 patients who had undergone surgery of an anus-near decubitus stage 3 or 4 were included in a matched-pair cohort study. Matching was realised according to age, gender, body mass index and general condition. RESULTS: The most common species in both groups was Staphylococcus spp.(45.0%). The only significantly different primary colonisation affected Escherichia coli, that was found in the stoma patients less often (18.3 and 43.3%, p < 0.01). A secondary microbial colonisation occurred in 15.8% and was equally distributed, except for Enterococcus spp. that was present in the stoma group only (6.7%, p < 0.05). The time to complete cure took longer in the stoma group (78.5 versus 57.0 days, p < 0.05) and was associated with a larger ulcer size (25 versus 16 cm2, p < 0.01). After correction for the ulcers' size, there was no association to outcome parameters such as overall success, healing time or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a diverting stoma alters the microbial flora of an anus-near decubitus slightly without impact on the healing process.

The impact of knee arthrodesis on gait kinematics, muscle activity and patient-reported outcome.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze gait kinematicsandoutcome parameters after knee arthrodesis. METHODS: Fifteenpatients with a mean follow-up of 5.9 (range0.8-36) years after unilateral knee arthrodesis were included. A 3D gait analysis was performed and compared to a healthy control group of14patients. Comparative electromyography was performed bilaterally at the rectus femoris, vastuslateralis/medialisand tibialis anterior muscles. The assessment further included standardized outcome scores- Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) andShort Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: The 3D analysis showed a significantly shortened stance phase (p = 0.000), an extended swing phase (p = 0.000), and an increased time per step (p = 0.009) for the operated side compared with thenonoperatedside. There were statistically significant differences in the extent of movement of the hips, knees and ankles among the operated andnonoperatedsides and the control group. For the mean EMG measurement, no significant difference was found between the healthy control group and the patients with arthrodesis.The average LEFSscorewas 27.5 ± 10.6out of a maximum of 80 points,and the mean physical total scale and mean emotional total scale scores for the SF-36 were 27.9 ± 8.5and 52.9 ± 9.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Arthrodesis of the knee joint causes significant kinematic changes in gait pattern,and patients achieve poor results in subjective and functional outcomes(SF- 36, LEFS).Arthrodesis ensures that the extremities are preserved and can enable walking, but it must be viewed as a severe handicap for the patient.

Improvement of vertebral body fracture reduction utilizing a posterior reduction tool: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Extensive research regarding instabilities and prevention of kyphotic malalignment in the thoracolumbar spine exists. Keystones of this treatment are posterior instrumentation and anterior vertebral height restoration. Anterior column reduction via a single-stage procedure seems to be advantageous regarding complication, blood loss, and OR-time. Mechanical elevation of the anterior cortex of the vertebra may prevent the necessity of additional anterior stabilization or vertebral body replacement. The purpose of this study was to examine (1) if increased bony reduction in the anterior vertebral cortex could be achieved by utilization of an additional reduction tool, (2) if postoperative loss of vertebral height could be reduced, and (3) if anterior column reduction is related to clinical outcome. METHODS: From one level I trauma center, 173 patients underwent posterior stabilization for fractures of the thoracolumbar region between 2015 and 2020. Reduction in the vertebral body was performed via intraoperative lordotic positioning or by utilization of an additional reduction tool (Nforce, Medtronic). The reduction tool was mounted onto the pedicle screws and removed after tightening of the locking screws. To assess bony reduction, the sagittal index (SI) and vertebral kyphosis angle (VKA) were measured on X-rays and CT images at different time points ((1) preoperative, (2) postoperative, (3) ≥ 3 months postoperative). Clinical outcome was assessed utilizing the Ostwestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: Bisegmental stabilization of AO/OTA type A3/A4 vertebral fractures was performed in 77 patients. Thereof, reduction was performed in 44 patients (females 34%) via intraoperative positioning alone (control group), whereas 33 patients (females 33%) underwent additional reduction utilizing a mechanical reduction tool (instrumentation group). Mean age was 41 ± 13 years in the instrumentation group (IG) and 52 ± 12 years in the control group (CG) (p < 0.001). No differences in terms of gender and comorbidities were found between the two groups. Preoperatively, the sagittal index (SI) was 0.69 in IG compared to 0.74 in CG (p = 0.039), resulting in a vertebral kyphosis angle (VKA) of 15.0° vs. 11.7° (p = 0.004). Intraoperatively, a significantly greater correction of the kyphotic deformity was achieved in the IG (p < 0.001), resulting in a compensation of the initially more severe kyphotic malalignment. The SI was corrected by 0.20-0.88 postoperatively, resulting in an improvement of the VKA by 8.7°-6.3°. In the CG, the SI could be corrected by 0.12-0.86 and the VKA by 5.1°-6.6°. The amount of correction was influenced by the initial deformity (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, both groups showed a loss of correction, resulting in a gain of 0.08 for the SI and 4.1° in IG and 0.03 and 2.0°, respectively. The best results were observed in younger patients with initially severe kyphotic deformity. Considering various influencing factors, clinical outcome determined by the ODI showed no significant differences between both groups. CONCLUSION: Utilization of the investigated reduction tool during posterior stabilization of vertebral body fractures in a suitable collective of young patients with good bone quality and severe fracture deformity may lead to better reduction in the ventral column of the fractured vertebral body and angle correction. Therefore, additional anterior stabilization or vertebral body replacement may be prevented.

Cage subsidence-A multifactorial matter!

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study OBJECTIVE: Wider cages are associated with improved decompression and reduced subsidence, but variation in cage physical properties limits consistent outcome analysis after thoracolumbar interbody fusion. This study investigated cage subsidence and its relationship to lateral and posterior approaches with a focus on the hypothesis that the larger surface area of lateral cages results in lower subsidence rates. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 194 patients who underwent interbody fusion between 2016 and 2019 with a primary outcome of cage subsidence. Secondary outcomes were cage distribution (patients, approaches, expandability), cage dimensions, t­scores, length of hospital stay, blood loss, surgical time, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch. RESULTS: Medical records were reviewed for 194 patients receiving 387 cages at 379 disc levels. Subsidence was identified in 35.1% of lateral cages, 40.9% of posterior cages, and 36.3% of all cages. Lower surface area (p = 0.008) and cage expandability were associated with subsidence risk. Lower anteroposterior cage length proved to be a significant factor in the subsidence of posteriorly placed cages (p = 0.007). Osteopenic and osteoporotic patients experienced cage subsidence 36.8% of the time compared to 3.5% of patients with normal t­scores (p = 0.001). Cage subsidence correlated with postoperative deterioration of the PI-LL mismatch (p = 0.03). Patients receiving fusion augmentation with bone morphogenic protein experienced higher fusion rates (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Cage subsidence is a common complication that can significantly impact operative outcomes following thoracolumbar interbody fusion. Low t­scores, smaller surface area, cage expandability, and lower cage length in posterior approaches contribute significantly to cage subsidence.

Assessment of Complication Risk in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis of 4019 Patients.

(1) Background: The treatment of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) is debated controversially. Current clinical knowledge is mainly based on small single-center cohorts. The goal of this study was to evaluate the predictability of risk factors for complications after the treatment of a PHF in a large clinical cohort in a multicentric setting. (2) Methods: Clinical data of 4019 patients with PHFs were retrospectively collected from 9 participating hospitals. Risk factors for local complications of the affected shoulder were assessed using bi- and multivariate analyses. (3) Results: Fracture complexity with n = 3 or more fragments, cigarette smoking, age over 65 years, and female sex were identified as predictable individual risk factors for local complications after surgical therapy as well as the combination of female sex and smoking and the combination of age 65 years or older and ASA class 2 or higher. (4) Conclusion: Humeral head preserving reconstructive surgical therapy should critically be evaluated for patients with the risk factors abovementioned.

[Resection arthroplasty and arthrodesis in revision shoulder arthroplasty]. / Resektionsarthroplastik und Arthrodese in der Prothesenrevision.

Shoulder arthrodesis and resection arthroplasty can be used as salvage procedures to treat severe complications after shoulder prosthesis failure. for both procedures, the indication and patient selection must be very strict. Shoulder arthrodesis after prosthesis failure can be indicated in young patients in case of chronic neuromuscular dysfunction. Filling the bony defect with either autologous or allogenic material and osteosynthetic primary stability are decisive for a good functional outcome. Aftercare comprises immobilization for 12 weeks and physical load is increased thereafter, depending on the sufficiency of bony consolidation. Resection arthroplasty after shoulder prosthesis failure is mostly reserved for multimorbid patients in case of a chronic infection. Thorough debridement and adequate systemic antibiotic treatment are crucial to achieve bacterial eradication.

Complication rates following stand-alone lateral interbody fusion: a single institution series after 10 years of experience.

PURPOSE: This retrospective single institution study's goal was to analyze and report the complications from stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIF). METHODS: This research was approved by the institutional review board (STUDY2021000113). We retrospectively reviewed the database of patients with adult degenerative spine deformity treated via LLIF at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. RESULTS: Stand-alone LLIF was performed in 158 patients (145 XLIF, 13 OLIF; mean age 65 y.; 88 f., 70 m.). Mean surgical time was 85 min (± 24 min). Mean follow-up was 14 months (± 5 m). Surgical blood loss averaged 120 mL (± 187 mL) and the mean number of fused levels was 1.2 (± 0.4 levels). Overall complication rate was 19.6% (31 total; 23 approach-related, 8 secondary complications). CONCLUSION: Lateral interbody fusion appears to be a safe surgical intervention with relatively low complication- and revision rates.

Monteggia fractures and Monteggia-like-lesions: a systematic review.

Monteggia injuries are rare, but severe injuries of the elbow including various injury patterns. Treatment of these injuries is still topic of debate and strategies differ widely. In this systematic review on Monteggia injuries in adults, we aimed to clarify the incidence of different injury patterns within Monteggia injuries, investigate the main reasons leading to revision surgery and explore which surgical treatments should be favored to achieve satisfactory clinical results.We initially identified 182 publications and ultimately included 17 retrospective studies comprising 651 cases. All patients were classified using the Bado classification, leading to 30.5% Bado type I fractures, 60.4% type II fractures, 5.1% type III and 3.1% type IV fractures. Mean revision rate was 23%. Ulna non-union (28%) and limited range-of-motion (22%) are the main reasons for revision surgery. Meta-analysis shows a trend toward the use of locking plates for ulna fixation which may lead to less revision surgery and fewer ulna non-unions. Further biomechanical and clinical research is necessary to clarify the role of radial head surgery.

Shoulder complaints and incidence of shoulder pathologies after contralateral major amputation in the mid and long-term.

INTRODUCTION: Amputations of the upper extremity are rare but present a life-altering event that is accompanied with considerable restrictions for the affected patients. Even with functional prosthesis, tasks of the amputated limb are usually transferred to the unaffected arm which could result in complaints of the unaffected shoulder in the mid and long term. We therefore aimed to investigate musculoskeletal pain and morphological degenerative changes of the shoulder following a contralateral amputation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all patients with a major amputation treated at our institution with a minimum of three years since the amputation. All patients received an MRI of both shoulders and were investigated using validated scores for the upper extremity and physical activity (SSV, ASES, DASH, GPAQ, SF-36). Results of the MRIs were investigated for morphological changes by two blinded investigators comparing the side of the amputation and the unharmed upper extremity and results were correlated to the time since amputation and their physical activity. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients with a mean age of 56 ± 19.9 years (range, 23-82 years) could be included in the study. The mean time since the amputation was 26.3 ± 19 years (range, 3-73 years). On the unharmed upper extremity, the mean SSV was 61.9 ± 24.6, the mean ASES-Score 54.5 ± 20.3, the Constant-score of 63.7 ± 40.4 and a DASH-score of 47.6 ± 23.8. The MRI of the unharmed shoulder showed significant more full-thickness rotator cuff tears and joint effusion compared to the side of the amputation. Significant differences in the degree of a glenohumeral arthritis, AC-joint arthritis, or partial rotator cuff tears could not be found between shoulders. CONCLUSION: Amputations of the upper extremity are associated with a high disability of the unharmed upper extremity and more full thickness rotator cuff tears compared to the side of the amputation. However, the small number of patients and rotator cuff injuries should be kept in mind when interpreting the data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (retrospective case series).

[New technologies and robotics]. / Neue Technologien und Robotik.

The development of increasingly more complex computer and electromotor technologies enables the increasing use and expansion of robot-assisted systems in trauma surgery rehabilitation; however, the currently available devices are rarely comprehensively applied but are often used within pilot projects and studies. Different technological approaches, such as exoskeletal systems, functional electrical stimulation, soft robotics, neurorobotics and brain-machine interfaces are used and combined to read and process the communication between, e.g., residual musculature or brain waves, to transfer them to the executing device and to enable the desired execution.Currently, the greatest amount of evidence exists for the use of exoskeletal systems with different modes of action in the context of gait and stance rehabilitation in paraplegic patients; however, their use also plays a role in the rehabilitation of fractures close to the hip joint and endoprosthetic care. So-called single joint systems are also being tested in the rehabilitation of functionally impaired extremities, e.g., after knee prosthesis implantation. At this point, however, the current data situation is still too limited to be able to make a clear statement about the use of these technologies in the trauma surgery "core business" of rehabilitation after fractures and other joint injuries.For rehabilitation after limb amputation, in addition to the further development of myoelectric prostheses, the current development of "sentient" prostheses is of great interest. The use of 3D printing also plays a role in the production of individualized devices.Due to the current progress of artificial intelligence in all fields, ground-breaking further developments and widespread application possibilities in the rehabilitation of trauma patients are to be expected.

[Augmented primary sutures "internal bracing" following ligamentous elbow dislocation]. / Augmentierte Primärnaht "internal bracing" nach ligamentärer Ellenbogenluxation.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of surgical treatment is the primary stabilization of the unstable elbow following a ligamentous elbow dislocation. INDICATIONS: Ligamentous elbow dislocations are typically accompanied by injuries to the surrounding musculature and collateral ligaments of the elbow joint. Surgical treatment is indicated in case of failure of nonoperative therapy, i.e., when a dislocation can only be prevented in immobilization > 90° and pronation of the elbow or an active muscular centering of the elbow fails after 5-7 days. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Contraindications for a solely "internal bracing" augmented primary suture are generally in the case of accompanying bony injuries in elbow dislocations, extensive soft-tissue injuries, and septic arthritis of the elbow. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The augmented primary suture of the elbow is performed using both a lateral (Kocher or Kaplan) and medial (FCU split) approach to the elbow. After reduction of the elbow, the collateral ligaments are first augmented with high-strength polyethylene suture and fixed in the distal humerus together with another high-strength polyethylene augmentation suture. The extensors and flexors are then fixed to the medial and lateral epicondyle, respectively, using suture anchors. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: The aim of the postoperative management is early functional exercise of the elbow. The elbow is placed in an elbow brace to avoid varus and valgus load. RESULTS: Between August 2018 and January 2020, a total of 12 patients were treated with an augmented primary suture following unstable ligamentous elbow dislocation. After a mean follow-up of 14 ± 12.7 months, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 98.5 points with a mean functional arc of 115°. None of the patients reported a recurrent dislocation or persistent instability of the elbow.

Popular Gym Fitness Sport: An Analysis of 1387 Recreational Athletes Regarding Prone to Pain Exercises and the Corresponding Localisations.

BACKGROUND: Recreational fitness sports are popular worldwide and rank first among organised sports. This study aims to bridge a knowledge gap by examining which exercises are most prone to causing pain symptoms, as a possible precursor for injury, and analysing the body regions that are most frequently affected. METHODS: Using an online questionnaire, 20 demographic and training-specific items and 49 sport-specific exercises were recorded. Frequent exercises as well as the incidence and distribution of pain symptoms that the athletes experienced during or in relation to their training were evaluated. RESULTS: The study assessed common exercises and documented the frequency and distribution of pain symptoms experienced by athletes during or in relation to their training. A total of 1387 respondents were included in this study. Of these, 732 (53.1%) experienced pain during their fitness training, with 333 (24.2%) being female and 397 (22.3%) being male. The method of creating a training plan showed a significant influence (p < 0.001): athletes who devised their own plans reported pain or instability more frequently than those in the comparison groups. Guided exercises on machines resulted in the lowest frequency of pain (11.54%), while exercises with free weights were associated with the highest pain rate among respondents (19.94%). Specifically, exercises such as the back squat, deadlift, bench press, and triceps dips were identified as the exercises most commonly associated with pain. The most frequently reported pain region was the shoulder, followed by the lower back and knees. CONCLUSION: The findings reveal a significant number of unreported pain symptoms. The disparity between rigorous training volumes and the absence of professional care frequently leads to injuries and pain. It is incumbent upon sports medicine to investigate the root causes of these complaints (pain or instability) to implement preventive measures against potential injuries.